|
|
 |
Eur 40 electrodialysis stacks for the demineralization
of cheese whey.
|
|
Dairy

|
WHEY DEMINERALIZATION PROCESSES
In the dairy industry, whey is obtained
from the manufacturing of cheese and casein. There is a high demand
for demineralized whey for many applications in human and cattle
feed: these include instant formula (baby food; min. 90 % demin.),
confectionary, baking, meats, etc. Depending on the use for the end
product, the demineralization process has tbe tailored taking intaccount the complete composition of the raw whey: this includes the
ash profile and the equivalent acid content. Thus, the optimum
demineralization processes will be different for wheys produced from
twtypes of cheese, even if these belong to the same cheese
category.
In the case of cheese whey, there are two
main grades of whey:
Sweet whey with a titrable acidity below
0.16 % or a pH above 6.0, from cooked cheeses
Acid whey with a titrable acidity above
0.4 % or a pH below 4.0, from soft, fermented, and cottage cheeses.
In casein manufacturing, the whey obtained
after coagulation with HCl or H2SO4 has a titrable acidity between
0.4 and 0.45 %.
With more than 20 operating systems
worldwide, Eurodia / Ameridia has a unique expertise in whey
demineralization processes, either internally developed or licensed
form close partners. In accordance with our general process
development philosophy, the optimum process for each dairy customer
might combine several technologies adapted to its specific product:
these include electrodialysis reversal (EDR), ion exchange resins (IER),
and nanofiltration (NF). For instance, nanofiltration is not
attractive if used alone for any demineralization rates above 35 %
because of the high losses of lactose and divalent ions: therefore,
NF could be useful as a pretreatment or postreatment step.
Similarly, ion exchange resins are not economically attractive when
used alone because of the high volume of effluents, the high running
cots, and the heavy pollution load. For more details about the use
of nanofiltration only to demineralize whey, please go also to the
Technologies Section/ Nanofiltration of this website.
Following, are some general guidelines for
the expected optimized overall demineralization process for sweet
whey:
SWEET WHEY DEMINERALIZATION
PROCESSES TO BE USED DEPENDING ON THE REQUIRED
DEMINERALIZATION RATE:
|
DEMINERALIZATION RATE (ON ASHES)
|
FEED
|
30%
|
50-70%
|
90%
|
DILUTED
SWEET WHEY
6% DS
|
nanofiltration
|
ion exchange resins + nanofiltration
|
electrodialysis + ion exchange resins + nanofiltration
|
PRECONCENTRATED SWEET WHEY
18-24% DS
|
electrodialysis
|
electrodialysis
|
ion exchange
resins + electrodialysis
|
EURODIA's DESIGN PRINCIPLES FOR
A WHEY DEMINERALIZATION PLANT
- Achieve the demineralized whey
specifications with the lowest operating costs and the most cost
effective investment.
- Maintain the quality of the valuable
product (proteins) by avoiding microbiological development and
thermal shocks (by operating at acidic pH as much as possible).
- Keep the dry solid and valuable product
yields as high as possible.
- Reduce the volume of waste effluent as
well as the pollution load.
- Design the demineralization process taking
into account the downstream process steps (i.e. evaporation,
standardization, spray drying…) to optimize their operating and
capital costs.
- Optimize the choices of technology,
materials, and instruments.
- Look for easy maintenance.
- Design to meet FDA and 3A requirements.
EXAMPLE
6 % DS SWEET WHEY DEMINERALIZATION FOR
INSTANT FORMULA RUNNING COSTS in €/kg DS

WHEY DEMINERALIZATION
PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY
1.ELECTRODIALYSIS
- Proprietary
spacers specifically designed to dramatically reduce the
internal leakage.
- Thus :
- Minimizes
valuable products losses
- Lowers pollution
load even after 10,000 hours of operation
- Improves the
current efficiency and the power consumption
- Reduces the
water consumption.
- Large range of
spacers available to adapt the technology to the product
- Different
thicknesses depending on of DS content and viscosity
- Different
materials (all FDA approved grade) to operate at temperatures
as high as 60°C
- Different types
of netting to optimize flows and lower pressure drops.
- Proprietary ion
exchange membranes (NEOSEPTAâ) manufactured by TOKUYAMA
CORPORATION
- Longest membrane
life
- All components
are Food Grade
- Organic fouling
resistant
- Metallic or
graphite long lasting electrodes designed to operate in the
current reversal mode (edr)
2. ION EXCHANGE RESINS AND COLUMNS
- Specific ion exchange resins developed
by RESINDION (MITSUBISHI CHEMICAL GROUP)
- Strong cation gel type with high DVB
content to improve the selectivity of resins when used as
softeners before ED (SODIUM PROCESS® patented by the SAFIR
Company).
- Adsorption of protein and complexed
salts is dramatically reduced.
- Strong anion resins of special grade
to be used with the above-mentioned strong cation resins in
mixed beds (density, granulometry, swelling)
- Weak cation resins (carboxylic) adaped
to reduce the divalent cations and adjust the pH.
- Weak anion resins with low swelling,
no adsorption of proteins, and high capacity for phosphorous
removal.
- Technology of IER columns
- Cost effective regarding feed
distribution and chemicals (regenerants) consumption
- Adapted to resins swelling (if low).
- Easy to move when increasing resins
volume for capacity increase
- Allowance for 100 % resin bed
expansion.
3. EASY MAINTENANCE AND OPTIMIZED
HYDRAULIC PIPING
- ED stacks can easily be handled,
disassembled and reassembled for on-site maintenance (in less than 2
hours per stack).
- Rod electrodes that can be replaced within
a few minutes (while hours are necessary for flat electrodes).
- Easy access to all key components (pumps,
valves, instruments).
- Selection of reliable instruments for
non-stop operation.
- Short hydraulic piping for both ED and IER
to optimize brine, chemicals, water and energy consumption.
- Specifically designed valve manifolds are
installed to avoid any risk of streams contamination (feed/product,
product/chemicals etc...)
- The on-line factor of our demineralization
plants is usually higher than 96 -98%.
EXAMPLE
SWEET WHEY DEMINERALIZATION FOR INSTANT
FORMULA

RAW MATERIAL COMPOSITION
SWEET WHEY
ANALYSIS (Table 1)
|
Raw material to process/day
|
400 000 L/d
|
408 840 kg
|
|
Total solid
|
6.30%
|
25 757 kg
|
|
Density
|
1.0221
|
1.0221
|
|
Processing time per
day
|
16 h/d
|
|
|
Annual production time
|
250d/year
|
|
|
Inlet temperature
|
4°C
|
|
|
Cost of raw material
|
|
|
| |
|
Note : Material balance is expressed in true proteins +
NPN, and not in total proteins.
|
|
CLIENT DATA (or literature data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RAW MATERIAL |
SWEET WHEY FROM CHEESE MAKING |
|
CLIENT'S
DATA
|
%
|
Solid/Day
|
Equivalents
|
Equivalents
|
Molecular
|
|
|
|
|
cations
|
anions
|
weight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(equivalent)
|
|
PH
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Density (abacus).
|
1.0221
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solids
|
6.300%
|
25
757 kg
|
|
|
|
|
Total protein
|
13.250%
|
3
413 kg
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen from casein.
|
0.040%
|
10
kg
|
|
|
120
mg/L
|
|
Whey proteins (estimated)
|
9.765%
|
2
515 kg
|
|
|
|
|
NPN (as Nitrogen)
|
0.540%
|
139
kg
|
|
|
6,38
|
|
Ash
|
8.900%
|
2
292 kg
|
|
|
70,5
|
|
Lactose
|
74.400%
|
19
163 kg
|
|
|
|
|
Fats
|
1.100%
|
283
kg
|
|
|
|
|
Ca++
|
0.625%
|
161
kg
|
8
049 eq.
|
|
20
|
|
Mg++
|
0.146%
|
38
kg
|
3
134 eq.
|
|
12
|
|
Na+
|
0.970%
|
250
kg
|
10
863 eq.
|
|
23
|
|
K+
|
2.100%
|
541
kg
|
13
869 eq.
|
|
39
|
|
NH3+
|
0.380%
|
98
kg
|
5
438 eq.
|
|
18
|
|
Fe++
|
0.010%
|
3
kg
|
92
eq.
|
|
27.93
|
|
Cu++
|
0.010%
|
3
kg
|
81
eq.
|
|
31.77
|
|
Cl-
|
2.163%
|
557
kg
|
|
15
694 eq.
|
35.5
|
|
P
|
0.600%
|
155
kg
|
|
4
989 eq.
|
31
|
|
NO3-
|
0.030%
|
8
kg
|
|
125
eq.
|
62
|
|
S
|
0.165%
|
42
kg
|
|
1
328 eq.
|
32
|
|
CO3--
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Lactic acid
|
1.400%
|
361
kg
|
|
4
007 eq.
|
90
|
|
acetic acid
|
0.196%
|
50
kg
|
|
841
eq.
|
60
|
|
Citric acid
|
1.800%
|
464
kg
|
|
2
634 eq.
|
176
|
|
Other 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking
|
|
24
764 kg
|
41
525 eq.
|
29
618 eq.
|
|
|
Other, by difference
|
96.10%
|
993 kg
|
-
41 525 eq.
|
-
29 618 eq.
|
|
RAW MATERIAL COMPOSITION (Adjusted data)
STANDARD SWEET WHEY (Table 2)
|
Adjusted
data
|
%
|
Solid/Day
|
Equivalents
|
Equivalents
|
Molecular
|
|
|
|
|
cations
|
anions
|
weight
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equ
|
|
PH
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Density (abacus).
|
1.0221
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solid
|
6.30%
|
25
757 kg
|
|
|
|
|
Total protein
|
13.25%
|
3
413 kg
|
|
|
|
|
Nitrogen from casein.
|
0.04%
|
10
kg
|
|
|
|
|
Whey proteins (estimated)
|
9.76%
|
2
515 kg
|
|
|
|
|
NPN (as Nitrogen)
|
0.54%
|
139
kg
|
|
|
6.38
|
|
Ash
|
8.28%
|
2
133 kg
|
|
|
70.5
|
|
Lactose
|
76,88%
|
19
801 kg
|
|
|
|
|
Fats
|
1.10%
|
283
kg
|
|
|
|
|
Ca++
|
0.63%
|
161
kg
|
8
049 equ
|
|
20
|
|
Mg++
|
0.15%
|
38
kg
|
3
134 equ
|
|
12
|
|
Na+
|
0.97%
|
250
kg
|
10
863 equ
|
|
23
|
|
K+
|
2.10%
|
541
kg
|
13
869 equ
|
|
39
|
|
NH3+
|
0.38%
|
98
kg
|
5
438 equ
|
|
18
|
|
Fe++
|
0.01%
|
3
kg
|
92
equ
|
|
27.93
|
|
Cu++
|
0.01%
|
3
kg
|
81
equ
|
|
31.77
|
|
Cl-
|
2.16%
|
557
kg
|
|
15
694 equ
|
35.5
|
|
P
|
0.60%
|
155
kg
|
|
4
989 equ
|
31
|
|
NO3-
|
0.03%
|
8
kg
|
|
125
equ
|
62
|
|
S
|
0.17%
|
42
kg
|
|
1
328 equ
|
32
|
|
CO3--
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Lactic acid
|
1.40%
|
361
kg
|
|
4
007 equ
|
90
|
|
acetic acid
|
0.20%
|
50
kg
|
|
841
equ
|
60
|
|
Citric acid
|
1.80%
|
464
kg
|
|
2
634 equ
|
176
|
|
Other 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking
|
100,00
%
|
25
757 kg
|
41
525 equ
|
29
618 equ
|
|
|
Other, by difference
|
|
|
-
41 525 equ
|
-
29 618 equ
|
|
|
Total mass
|
|
408 840 kg
|
|
|
|
|
Water
|
|
383 083 kg
|
|
|
|
|
Total volume
|
|
400 000 L/d
|
|
|
|
INLET / OUTLET BALANCE OF DEMINERALIZATION PROCESS (Table 3)
|
STANDARD SWEET WHEY
Adjusted analysis
|
%
|
Solid/Day
|
Demineralized whey outlet (non standardized)
|
%
|
Solid/Day
|
PRODUCTION
|
|
PH
|
6.5
|
|
PH
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
Density (abacus).
|
1.022
|
|
Density (abacus).
|
1.089
|
|
|
|
Solid
|
6.30%
|
25 757 kg
|
Solid
|
21.62%
|
22 335 kg
|
86.72%
|
|
Total protein
|
13.25%
|
3 413 kg
|
Total protein
|
13.86%
|
3 096 kg
|
90.73%
|
|
Nitrogen from casein.
|
0.04%
|
10 kg
|
Nitrogen from casein.
|
|
|
|
|
Whey proteins (estimated)
|
9.76%
|
2 515 kg
|
Whey proteins (estimated)
|
11.10%
|
2 479 kg
|
98.55%
|
|
NPN (as Nitrogen)
|
0.54%
|
139 kg
|
NPN (as Nitrogen)
|
0.43%
|
97 kg
|
69.62%
|
|
Ash
|
8.28%
|
2 133 kg
|
Ash
|
0.37%
|
82 kg
|
3.84%
|
|
Lactose
|
76.88%
|
19 801 kg
|
Lactose
|
86.84%
|
19 395 kg
|
97.95%
|
|
Fats
|
1.10%
|
283 kg
|
Fats
|
1.26%
|
280 kg
|
98.94%
|
|
Ca++
|
| | |